Resources

Client Alerts, News Articles, Blog Posts, & Multimedia

Everything you need to know about BMD and the industry.

Advanced Practice Providers and Telemedicine Start-Up Surge

Client Alert

Overview:

Throughout the COVID-19 pandemic, we heard a lot about “surges” that happened all over the country regarding the virus.  One of the other interesting “surges” we have followed is the “surge” in new healthcare business start-ups, particularly businesses owned by advanced practice providers, such as nurse practitioners, physician assistants, certified nurse midwives, clinical nurse specialists, and certified registered nurse anesthetists (“Advanced Practice Providers” or “APPs”).  One of the hottest areas in the healthcare start-up surge has been the creation of practices that are telemedicine focused.  

While telemedicine is not a new concept, the number of practices and providers actually utilizing telemedicine has increased dramatically since the start of the pandemic. With this soar, providers, particularly APPs, have increasingly asked for assistance with appropriately structuring these new businesses and tackling questions regarding their telemedicine scope of practice and their ability to prescribe medications to patients who have not received an in-person examination. This article will address common questions that we have been asked by APPs trying to implement telemedicine in their own practices.

Scope of Practice:

The first things to remember with regard to telemedicine is that a provider must generally follow the laws and regulations of the state where the patient is located at the time of the visit.  With regards to scope of practice for APPs using telemedicine, it is important to note that this is rapidly changing, particularly because the drive for APP autonomy and full practice authority is in full force across the country, and each state’s scope of practice rules and regulations are different. 

Additionally, each state has wide variation in their telemedicine laws governing scope of practice while utilizing telemedicine, and those parameters have been changing quickly.  For example, in Pennsylvania, there were no telemedicine statutes in place prior to the pandemic, which meant rules neither prohibited nor authorized the use of telemedicine. However, Senate Bill 705 was introduced in 2021, which addressed the regulation of telemedicine by professional licensing boards and insurance coverage for services provided via telemedicine. 

Similarly, in Ohio, as a result of the pandemic, House Bill 122 was passed and will take effect March 23, 2022. As a result, Ohio Revised Code § 4743.09 lists advanced practice registered nurses and physician assistants among those health care professionals permitted to provide services via telemedicine, using either synchronous or asynchronous technology. Essentially, through this rule, the Ohio Board of Nursing (for APRNs) and Board of Medicine (for PAs) are granted permission to implement telemedicine rules in order to carry out the Bill. 

Prescribing to patients who an APP has not seen in person is another issue that has presented itself during the pandemic, with many states’ scope of practice laws not addressing the issue. However, states such as Virginia, for example, have implemented remote prescribing rules, focusing primarily on limitations associated with prescribing controlled substances.[1] With telemedicine being widely used since the start of the pandemic, it is likely that states and licensing boards will begin implementing more concrete rules related to remote prescribing, if they have not done so already.

Billing:

Another common category of telemedicine questions relates to what services providers can provide to patients utilizing telemedicine, and how these services are to be billed. For Medicare patients, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (“CMS”) has provided a list of services that may be reimbursed if provided via telemedicine in their “List of Telehealth Services for Calendar Year 2022.” 

While state Medicaid programs usually try to mirror Medicare, not all requirements will be the same. As such, it is important for nurse practitioners to look at their state’s Medicaid laws addressing telehealth in order to determine what services are covered and review any additional requirements there may be.     

Commercial insurers are also likely to list the telemedicine services they cover for reimbursement. Additionally, many states have implemented rules protecting coverage of telemedicine services. For example, in Missouri, health carriers and health benefit plans cannot deny coverage for a service solely because it was rendered via telemedicine if the service would have been reimbursed if the patient was seen in person.[2] Ohio’s H.B. 122 includes similar protections that require insurers to reimburse for telemedicine services. 

If you have any questions about healthcare business start-ups, telemedicine scope of practice, prescribing guidelines, reimbursement rules, or any other healthcare legal issues that arise, please contact Jeana Singleton by email at: jmsingleton@bmdllc.com, or by phone at: (330) 253-2001.

[1] Virginia Code § 38.2-3418.16.

[2] Missouri Statute § 376.1900.


Florida's Recent Ruling on Arbitration Clauses

Florida’s recent ruling on arbitration clauses provides a crucial distinction in determining whether such clauses are void as against public policy and providers may have the opportunity to include arbitration clauses in their patient consent forms. On March 6, 2024, Florida’s Fourth District Court of Appeals reversed and remanded Florida’s Fifteenth Circuit Court ruling of Piero Palacios v. Sharnice Lawson. The Court of Appeals ruled that the parties’ arbitration agreement did not contradict the Legislature’s intent of Florida’s Medical Malpractice Act (the “MMA”), but rather reflects the parties’ choice to arbitrate claims entirely outside of the MMA’s framework. Therefore, the Court found that the agreement was not void as against public policy.

Corporate Transparency Act Update 3/14/24

On March 1, 2024, a federal district court in the Northern District of Alabama concluded that the Corporate Transparency Act (“CTA”) exceeded Congressional powers and enjoined the Department of the Treasury from enforcing the CTA against the plaintiffs. National Small Business United v. Yellen, No. 5:22-cv-01448 (N.D. Ala.). On March 11, 2024, the U.S. Department of Justice appealed the district court’s decision to the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals.

The Ohio State University Launches Its Accelerated Bachelor of Science in Nursing Program

In response to Ohio’s nursing shortage, The Ohio State University College of Nursing is accepting applications for its new Accelerated Bachelor of Science in Nursing program (aBSN). Created for students with a bachelor’s degree in non-nursing fields, the aBSN allows such students to obtain their nursing degree within 18 months. All aBSN students will participate in high-quality coursework and gain valuable clinical experience. Upon completion of the program, graduates will be eligible to take the State Board, National Council of Licensure Exam for Registered Nursing (NCLEX-RN).

Another Transparency Obligation: The FinCEN Beneficial Ownership Information Reporting Requirements

Many physician practices and healthcare businesses are facing a new set of federal transparency requirements that require action now. The U.S. Department of Treasury Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (“FinCEN”) Beneficial Ownership Information Reporting Requirements (the “Rule”), which was promulgated pursuant to the 2021 bipartisan Corporate Transparency Act, is intended to help curb illegal finance and other impermissible activity in the United States.

“In for a Penny, in for a Pound” is No Longer the Case for Florida Lawyers

On April 1, 2024, newly adopted Rule 1.041 to the Florida Rules of Civil Procedures goes into effect which creates a procedure for an attorney to appear in a limited manner in civil proceedings.  Currently, when a Florida attorney appears in a civil proceeding, he or she is reasonable for handling all aspects of the case for their client.  This new rule authorizes an attorney to file a notice limiting the attorney’s appearance to particular proceedings or specified matters prior to any appearance before the court.  For example, an attorney can now appear for the limited purpose of filing and arguing a motion to dismiss.  Once the motion to dismiss is heard by the court, the attorney may file a notice of termination of limited appearance and will have no further obligations in the case.